Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

school should incorporate some basic military training of 2 year which is spread between 6 year 6th class to 12 helps in building disciplines and good character and help in self defence and organisation

Yes, unless the person has any condition which would make it difficult for him/her to pursue military service

Yes, so that they can survive during natural calamities. Self defence skills must be improved for every person

Ideally Yes, but current education system need to be reformed for the same.

Of course at least 2 years not 1

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record and the focus must be more in skill development and less on military training.

It matters on population . For country like Israel it's good for india there is already a huge military

Yes but more as part of self defence technique than a proper military training

yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on social service

Yes, but not compulsory for everyone as the population is too large

Yes, especially when you are going in a government job which has less accountability to people

Yes, but for those who do not wish to pursue further education, and with the same amount of focus on military training and education and skill development, and it should be at least two years of service

No , But With More Focus On Military Traing And Less Focus On Education And Skill Development

No, but a person should positively contribute to the nation.

Every education institution from schools should mandatorily provide basic military skills, Yoga, training in ancient skills like kalari, and the best should be selected from them to give additional military training depending on the place they should be assigned, like in arunachal pradesh mountain hiking skill etc., particular skill should be required to particular area because of diverse areas and situations in our country, they should be selected permanently as a military officer depending on their skill set

Military service should be made an attractive career option. Compulsory conscription leads to well-trained fighters who can use their skills to the detriment of a society already having deep inequalities.

Yes and choice to opt out voluntarily

No, this is a security risk

No, but it should be promoted more.

Only hindus should get military training

Ideally it should be based upon free will, so I would say no. However, if a country has a very low population, it cannot easily get sufficient voluntary conscripts who're willing to serve a fixed period of service. Such countries have no other option than to impose mandatory service of 1-3 years upon its graduating students. This wouldn't be all required if no country strived to maintain a military.

It should be for all with opt-out facility. The default is opt-in.

Only in case of invasion

Yes, giving the option of the military, fire department or Charitable organisations

Only kshatriyas should serve in Indian army

According to the Geopolitical situation of the time.

government should not force everyone. but if some one is interested then they can take him

There should be compulsory 4 years military training for men and 3 years military training for women

No, it is Impractical for India and should be a choice.

No, it will degrade the quality of soldiers

Nor compulsory but everyone should be made aware

Yes but those who are fit for service along with others left being trained for survival skills, education and skill development.

No, it should be a choice. although such a short service scheme can be initiated for attracting more students.

No, conscription in a country the size of India is too costly.

Yes, until someone has severe physical problems.

No, but there should be compulsory service in wartime

No, Military training should be given to all

Indian Army is self sufficient to fight wars on 2.5 fronts at a time.

Only for healthy individuals

First they have to check their medical reports and check whether they are willing to serve their country or not.

yes for one year

Every 18+ should be given basic training so that all can self defense and can be ready if call by defence.

How do you perceive the balance between individual freedom and civic duty when considering a year of compulsory military service?

If given a choice, would you prefer alternative forms of national service, such as in healthcare or community work, over military service?

How might a year of mandatory service affect relationships and family planning for young adults?

Do you feel that the discipline and structure of the military could be an effective tool in shaping responsible adults, or is it too restrictive?

Would the obligation to serve in the military for a year influence your voting decisions or political involvement?

In what ways do you think requiring a year of military service might change your perspective on global conflicts and national security?

How do you think mandatory military service at 18 could affect the sense of national identity and unity among young people?