In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the…
Read more@9GJX2PFMarxist Communist6mos6MO
It's hard to say because in the current formation of capitalism. Private companies are not impartial, anyone with money can shift the narrative for their favour.
@9D37BNZBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Nuanced regulation, where clear libel/defamation and objective lies are replaced may be acceptable. Other type of "fake news" should be treated with much less regulation, such as simply putting an annotation
@9CQTP72Bharatiya Janata9mos9MO
The state should regulate social media companies in order to prevent threats to public order, Indian sovereignty and territorial integrity
@9CQNYWZBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Yes, but only to uphold law of the land.
@9CQHY6ZBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Social Media sites should be regulated to the extent if they are stifling free speech.
@9CQF4CY9mos9MO
Govt must not have unlimited power over this matter.
@9CQ92SD9mos9MO
Yes as long as it's regulated fairly.
@9CQ8TZJBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Yes, but Regulations should have valid reasons. For fake news, better make a centralised Fact Check Database for anyone to refer from.
Fake News & Misinformation is not limited to social media. The focus should be to how to respond and have a way to correcting the information post that their should be price if found malicious intend
@9CQ5PVFBiju Janata Dal9mos9MO
Government shouldn’t have the right to decide what’s true and what’s fake, but fact checking organisations should be allowed and encouraged to do so, and keep a check on the spread of fake news and misinformation
No. that is the job of the social media companies not Govt. Always keep Govt. at a distance
@9CPYZKP9mos9MO
Yes, Regulated only if considerable number report it fake..
@9B8HSVBIndependent1yr1Y
The government should reprimand social media sites for any offensive material but let them function on their own without state regulation.
@9987HWC1yr1Y
Yes, and make social media and news companies declare their political stance if they were to advertise their own stance towards a political issue as part of their company portfolios.
@93PWHXL2yrs2Y
I think that social media sites should be regulated, but I don't trust the government to determine what is fake or real news. There should be some independent obudsman responsible for determining that.
@8Y6NQC3Independent2yrs2Y
There should be private independent bodies for fact checking
Governments are funding social media to create fake news for votebank.
@8V8RS56Independent3yrs3Y
This might lead to a social media which is biased towards the govt. Rather people should be educated through awareness campaigns how to decrease internet usage, the negative effects of biased, fake news and propaganda on society, and how to use the social media and at the same time mitigate its negative effects.
@8V2PWX23yrs3Y
Social media companies should create their own policies.
@8TFH9MG3yrs3Y
No, but social media companies need to regulate
@8T2VCJ9Independent3yrs3Y
No, but only if the fake news and misinformation does not threaten our national security.
No real solution available yet.. Social media platforms are politically biased but government regulation won't help either.
The government shouldn't but private fact-checking companies should
@8SHFGMB3yrs3Y
The judiciary should decide and regulate if a news is fake or not.
@8S2VW3LBharatiya Janata3yrs3Y
Regulations but with some limitations
@8RQJWRH3yrs3Y
No. The government will only use this as an excuse to manipulate actual news in their favour.
@8RPP46D3yrs3Y
No, but execute stricter laws and punishments for those who spread harmful fake news and mislead people
@8RPNP8D3yrs3Y
I don't trust the current government to regulate social media sites although it is a necessity to combat misinformation
Regulation must be done by an independent organization and media platforms must be incentivised for combating fake news
@8QHLWH63yrs3Y
This is a dicey situation where governments themselves determine what is fake and what isn’t. This could lead to blurring of the truths and lies.
No. Government itself is the biggest peddler of fake news.
Independent fact checkers should regulate them, not the government.
@8Q83TR53yrs3Y
No, Government itself influences these companies.
@8PLLV743yrs3Y
no, instead awareness among the people must be increased to tackle the rise of fake news and misinformation
No, but social media sites should have the means to identify and remove fake news and misinformation
@9CQJS789mos9MO
Govt can make laws for fake news, ask social media companies to be more vigilant but regulations can be misused.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, but government should encourage self-regulation of social media companies through increased fines when perceived and/or proven illegal content is not removed within a set period of time
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
No, but Congress should pass a law that will increase the self-regulation of social media companies through increased fines when perceived and/or proven illegal content is not removed within a set period of time
@5JJ24SW2yrs2Y
No, this becomes an opening for the government to determine what is or isn't true, but they should be financially punished for allowing rampant misinformation.
@93VVP972yrs2Y
Require them to be bipartisan on both sides.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Only during national emergencies.
@7J7L92W2yrs2Y
Yes, users of social media are free to share what they please, but anyone who is, advertises themselves as, or comes across to a reasonable person as a news organization should have a legal obligation to tell the truth. Additionally, where the truth is not known, it should be illegal for such organizations to make things up, but rather these organizations should have to wait before making more informed judgements. This would diminish the capability of users to share fake news as the fake news would not exist, as opposed to simply not be shared.
@93MT5DD2yrs2Y
The government should punish social media companies that censor information and viewpoints that are not direct calls to violence ,explicit violent threats, or obscenity
@93CCRPH2yrs2Y
An entity separate from government or social media should determine fake or misleading news and social media companies should be required to provide a warning/disclaimer on posts containing false or misleading information
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, just make sure there are warnings for fake news.
@Panagioti9992yrs2Y
All social media should be nationalised and treated as public space.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, only put warnings for fake news.
@92N5JGD2yrs2Y
no, but require them to label information in 3 terms. Fact, opinion, and report. All "fact" stories, must have 3 sources to refer to with up to 2% of descriptive adjectives allowed. All "report" stories are to be understood as to be too new to cite sources and with the disclaimer that it may or may not be untrue. All opinion pieces must be pro dominantly labeled as such. This includes all media - paper, video, and live events. This is for audience reference ONLY!!
@92GWJXX2yrs2Y
Make sure fake news is labeled as such
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...