Foreign electoral interventions are attempts by governments, covertly or overtly, to influence elections in another country. A 2016 study by Dov H. Levin concluded that the country intervening in most foreign elections was the United States with 81 interventions, followed by Russia (including the former Soviet Union) with 36 interventions from 1946 to 2000. In July 2018 U.S. Representative Ro Khanna introduced an amendment that would have prevented U.S. intelligence agencies from receiving funding that could be used to interfere in the elections of foreign governments. The amendment would…
Read more@9FMZP8H7mos7MO
No any interference in Democratic processes make India look autocratic
@9F5BVMZ8mos8MO
On on adversary countries. Manipulate their elections so that the adversary countries do not under any circumstances be united and stand against us. For this we will use covert operations and election influence. What we want to know is that what makes them take a particular decision and what variables influence that decision making (on a political level)
@9BVSN3L12mos12MO
Address security threats and should interfere in pakistan
Yes, only to protect our national interests
@9CXNWBXBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Not in too much capacity untill we get into position of strength similar to China.
@9CR478WBharatiya Janata10mos10MO
Yes, using fair means for monetary and security reasons
@9CR3PH910mos10MO
If India was a Maoist state then yes to defeat reactionary elements in other countries.
@9CQTP72Bharatiya Janata10mos10MO
Interfere in other countries when it helps secure Indian interests and if it doesn’t backfire. Typically neighbourhood is where we can do that
@9CQMQWPBharatiya Janata10mos10MO
Only that countries that interfere with ours.
@9CQFJSZ10mos10MO
@9CQCWVPIndian National Congress10mos10MO
To protect our own country’s interests
@9CQ2Y63Bharatiya Janata10mos10MO
If it helps my country, YES
@9CPVJRNBharatiya Janata10mos10MO
yes as long as it is to protect national interests
@9CPM65QBharatiya Janata10mos10MO
Only to those countries which has a track record of intervention in our democracy.
@92YHQCV2yrs2Y
No, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it.
@8T9PVBS2yrs2Y
Yes, other countries are interfering with our elections too much and we should start doing it back
@8YPV9GG2yrs2Y
Yes, to the extent that not doing so would have catastrophic consequences for the world. As such, this should only be done against countries who are endangering the world via nuclear threat or climate change-related behaviors. Which is to say Russia and Brazil specifically, maybe India.
@8TB798W2yrs2Y
Yes, to support the protection of individual rights.
@8Y9795B2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if a potential leader is a threat to countries outside of the one they'd be elected to.
@8KTRB5Z3yrs3Y
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler. The U.S. government should not tamper with the voting process of foreign elections.
@558YLXV4yrs4Y
Yes, but only publicly; no country should covertly influence or interfere with foreign elections.
Deleted4yrs4Y
No, stay out of foreign conflicts
@8CC8MRT4yrs4Y
Yes, but only as a retaliatory measure
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
