Should the government use economic stimulus to aid the country during times of recession?

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle- and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession, as well as reduced government spending

Cut taxes across the board including corporate taxes.

Yes, and nationalise natural resources and heavy industry

No, but when severe like 1930s is exception.(I am Korean so my English is not so good :) )

No, but we can consider it if The Great Depression of 1930s happens again

No, but when deadly like 1930s is exeption

No, but when severe like 1930s is exception

Yes, and reduce governmental spending

No, but when it is deadly like 1930s is exception

The government should drastically reduce all taxation and public spending during recessions.

No, but when deadly severe like 1930s is exception.

Yes and include more restricted groups, like legal dependent adults

No, but when deadly like 1930s is exception.

I honestly don’t know

Yes, but in the form of: - tax breaks for all citizens - assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession

Yes, but: 1.) in the form of tax breaks for all citizens 2.) in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by recession

Yes, by using tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in spending on unnecessary expenses.

Yes, by using tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in government spending on unnecessary expenses.

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle and low-income citizens, as well as reduction in government spending on unnecessary expenses.

Yes, but only by 1) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and 2) reduce spending on unnecessary expenses. The government should only focus on helping citizens who were most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by 1) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and 2) reduce spending on unnecessary expenses. The government should only prioritize citizens who were most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by a) emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and b) reducing spending on unnecessary expenses in order to stabilize our economy. The government should only prioritize on those most affected by the recession, not those that caused it; it should also not make citizens reliant on the government once the recession is over.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure until the markets have stabilized; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. It should be used to help restart the economy; and once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt.
However, the government should focus only by helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure until the markets have stabilized; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. It should be used to help restart the economy; and once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt.
However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens, and as a temporary measures to stabilize markets; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. The government should focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession instead of those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets. Measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. However, the government should instead focus on helping citizens mostly affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but only by emphasizing tax breaks for all citizens and as a temporary measure to stabilize markets; measures must be taken to ensure this only occurs during times of recession. Once the recession is over, the government should curtail excess spending in order to reduce national debt. However, the government should only focus on helping citizens most affected by the recession, not on those that caused it.

Yes, but in the form of stimulus checks to citizens; bailouts of industries encourages poor fiscal policies.

Yes, but only depending on the circumstances. In a recessionary environment with high inflation, stimulus may only exacerbate the problem.

Continue to provide welfare for those who need it, and only provide economic stimulus in ways that will ultimately not increase our national debt.

Yes, by directly helping the citizens directly not a trickle down.

Yes but for 18 months only

Yes but never for more than a year and only for individuals needing the most assistance.

Yes, by reducing spending, tax breaks for lower income citizens, and establish a Universal Basic Income

No, government stimulus is bad for the market and tax payer, especially when government causes said recessions and depressions i.e. the great depression and great recession. That was government failure and is just failed Keynesian economics that have only hurt people since Keynesian economics became the norm.

Sometimes government intervention may be necessary, but only as a last resort

Yes but only for individuals of low income that make less than 40 thousand a year.

Yes, stimulus and tax breaks.

Stimulus exacerbates the problem. The poor must be given tax breaks, whilst the rich must have to pay a little bit higher taxes. Let the market correct itself over time. The government, besides using taxes, should only encourage people to work and correct recessions. Otherwise, it should sit back, correct misinformation, and let economists and the people handle recessions.

Yes, but it should be restricted and for a small amount of money.

yes they should but only one time don't issue it a bunch of times

Yes, but in the form of A. tax breaks for low-income citizens, B. tax breaks for all citizens, C. increased spending on infrastructure, and/or D. assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession. Plus, the government should try to intervene to boost a recovery.

Yes, but discourage people from living solely on benefits.

only if there is a great need, much like this pandemic. and the money should actually go to people in need unlike what happened with this pandemic

No, government stimulation is like steroids; It may help in the short term, but it will inevitably lead to problems later on due to, put simply, overexpansion. This is what caused the Great Depression, 2008, and nearly every other major recession.

Do a study on the efficiency and ethics and effects of each tax and apply accordingly.

Yes, but in the form of providing employment opportunities (like the Civilian Conservation Corps).

Yes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only.

Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan.

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for everyone except those in the highest tax bracket

No, but it should do it's best to help without using direct government power to do it. For example, they can have a competition to have the public crowdsource solutions.

No, unless it is in the form of tax breaks for all citizens

No, unless in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens

No for companies, yes for citizens.

Yes, but in the form of stimulus checks to all citizens

Yes, but individual's who are in need should apply for the stimulus. It shouldn't just be given to everyone.

Yes, but quantitative easements must stop as they endanger our economy more than they help it.

Yes, but only in the form of direct payments to Americans

Yes, but 1) only at a locally combined rate at the Region/State/Metro area to the specifically affected companies and their employees, 2) to sectors that provide immediate jobs, training, and 3) a patr-time State/Federal volunteer program various public works projects (part-time to allow for re-education, earned income, and time off to look for new work or relocation).

Yes, for small businesses

Yes, for small businesses and people earning under $100k

Yes, and during the next large recession, the government should prioritize switching to the metric system

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

Do so with a permanent UBI.

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks and increased spending on infrastructure since they are both proven ways to boost the economy

Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession and extended unemployment benefits for workers

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of individual unemployment compensation benefits

Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending unemployment benefits for a greater length of time

Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, with an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify

Yes, with the combination of increased spending on infrastructure and quarterly economic stimulus checks for low and middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for those who qualify

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment benefits for workers

Yes, but in the form of monetary checks for citizens

No, there is not enough money to do so. If we print out more money inflation will go up and the American dollar will devalue.

Yes, through the combination of increased spending on infrastructure, lowering interest rates on student loans, and extending the time period for receiving unemployment compensation benefits

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure and tax breaks for low income citizens

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, tax breaks for low income citizens, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation for workers.

Yes, but only depending on how many people are in the household, and the current rate should be reduced.

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment benefits

Yes, in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and extended unemployment compensation.

Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for middle-income and low-income citizens and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

don;t know

Yes, but in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens and increased spending on infrastructure

Yes, in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

Yes, in the forms of tax breaks for low income citizens, increased spending on infrastructure, and assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended time periods for citizens to receive unemployment benefits. ,

Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment compensation

Yes, through increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation.

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and an extended period of unemployment benefits for both middle income and low income citizens

Yes, in the forms of extended unemployment compensation and increased spending on infrastructure

Yes, but in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure and unemployment benefits as well as lowering interest rates

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, quarterly stimulus checks for low-and-middle income citizens, and extended unemployment compensation benefits

Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, quarterly economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation

Yes, in the forms of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, economic stimulus checks for low-and-middle-income citizens, and an extended period of unemployment compensation

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and extended unemployment compensation benefits for low and middle-income citizens

Yes, in the forms of increased spending on infrastructure, assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession, and an extended period of unemployment compensation benefits for citizens