Should cities be allowed to offer private companies economic incentives to relocate?

No, instead the government should impose heavy taxes on the industries that open the offices in the class A and class B cities which are already congested; have incentive for relocating the industries to the rural / backward areas; and that too only if

yes but they cant be offered incentives to relocate from poorer areas because we must make poor areas richer

As long as they pay a good wage and tax it should be fine but if they want extra tax cuts they should be able to pay higher wages atleast.

It depends on the nature of projects and it's impact on people living in the locality.

No, cities should not, but the Central government should provide incentives to relocate TO India

Yes because they create jobs but environment should not be harmed

yes, as long as tax revenue will eventually exceed the incentives and it does not negatively effect the local environment

Yes, but only if the incentives apply to all businesses

Yes, but the govts should ensure that poor cities who cant offer large imcentives to companies are also developed

Yes the government can incentivise but not to the biggest businesses but to small and medium scale businesses by analysing there model and regulating safer environmental norms plus increasing hiring chances of the locals.

Depends on lot of factors like the current economic status, tax regime and the balance sheet of government.

Yes as long as the local environment is not compromised, tax revenue must eventually exceed the tax incentives and company promises to create jobs by hiring local citizens

Yes, but only if the cities are located within India, and their natural environments are not compromised.

I do not have an education in the subject matter.

No, deregulate the economy to attract companies.

Only small business can be helped through subsiding for a certain period of time rather than giving incentives

How might a city ensure that the benefits of hosting a giant corporation outweigh the sacrifices made in tax incentives?

If a company's arrival means a rise in your city's cost of living, is it still worth the economic incentives provided?

Would you give up certain city services if it meant your city could attract a big tech company and potentially boost the economy?

In what ways could a community benefit from having a major corporation like Amazon move in, apart from job creation?

What are some potential downsides for a community when it gives large tax incentives to attract private companies?

Should smaller local businesses get the same financial incentives as large corporations; why or why not?

How would the arrival of a big corporation in your town change your day-to-day life, for better or worse?

If a major corporation offered to bring 10,000 jobs to your city but requested significant tax breaks, would you support it and why?

What could your community do with the funds that are often offered to mega-corporations as incentives to relocate?

How would you feel if a large company received tax breaks to move to your town at the cost of funding for local schools and infrastructure?

Yes as long as the company plans to employ local citizens of the area and I would prefer a lower corporate tax for all businesses, but I believe personally that this should be left to the states.

Nationalize all Industry

No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country, and spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies.

Yes, as long as three criteria are met: the local environment is not compromised, the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents, and the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives

No, spend that money on improving the community and infrastructure, and the government shouldn’t subsidize private businesses.

Yes, as long as the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents and the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives

Honestly I'm not too sure

Yes, but only if three criteria are met: the local environment is not compromised, the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

Yes, as long as three criteria are met: the local environment is not compromised; the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives; the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

Yes, but that money should instead be spent on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

Yes as long as the environment isn't harmed and it is beneficial such as providing more jobs for locals and people overall, etc.

Yes, as long as three criteria are met: the local environment is not compromised, the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

No; punish private companies for moving jobs out of the country, the government should never, and spend the money on improving infrastructure and the community

Yes, but only in tax reductions. I would prefer taxes be lowered for everyone rather than for individual companies.

Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, the local environment is not compromised, and the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised and the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives

Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised, the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents.

Yes, it should be allowed, but it should not be mandatory for private companies to relocate if they do not wish to.

Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised, the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

All of the yes options but the last one (lower corp tax). Set the standard to 25% nationally and 2.5% state and 2.5% municipal.

Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives, and if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring many local residents

Yes, as long as the the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents, the local environment is not compromised, and the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives.

Yes, as long as the the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents, the local environment is not compromised, and the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives