Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?
@9CQW3JG9mos9MO
Yes, but only if there's no other option
@9CQPNCVBharatiya Janata9mos9MO
Exception to few animals
@9CQF4CY9mos9MO
A few species of animals only
@9CPXFS2Independent9mos9MO
Those that are not endangered and identical to human behaviour
I dont have enough information to make a decision
No, it's violating the safety of life of animals
@8W2JD2L3yrs3Y
For Any Type of Human Development , we have no rights to use animals or environment, already World's Most countries hardly damaged to Ecosystem, now Its time to save Ecosystem
@8TFM6WN3yrs3Y
Yes but try using criminals and prisoners as much as you can
@8T6RZVXIndependent3yrs3Y
Currently, testing should be allowed in all of the given areas except cosmetics. However, research should be conducted into methods of testing that do not involve animals in order to minimize their unnecessary suffering.
@8QY4KB9Bharatiya Janata3yrs3Y
Yes, but it should be ensured that the animal suffers as less as possible.
only for drugs/vaccines, and subject to honest evaluation by ethical committee.
sise effects should be taken in considerisation
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@842VWLK2yrs2Y
yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.
@7VRTYM52yrs2Y
Yes, but only less important animals.
@92JXK3J2yrs2Y
Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.
@93GLTS32yrs2Y
Yes, unless the animals go through pain.
@93FNHSZ2yrs2Y
Yes as long as it’s not cruel and inhumane
@LiamHal786386402yrs2Y
Yes and allow human testing
@9334YP32yrs2Y
Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.
@932GCCP2yrs2Y
Yes, but only things like rats and stuff
@92XHX9V2yrs2Y
as long as they are not harmed
@92W2JVT2yrs2Y
No, and it should have a consequence (jail)
@92T53D92yrs2Y
Yes, but strictly rodents
@92PFG4M2yrs2Y
Its a bad thing to not hurt animals
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species
@8ZY28ML2yrs2Y
yes only for rats though
@8ZY2C692yrs2Y
Only if its a pointless animal.
@8M258QP2yrs2Y
No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.
@8ZLFQSG2yrs2Y
Yes, but not if it’ll harm the animal
@8ZMSVTB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only on non-intelligent animals
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.
@8ZLFQJW2yrs2Y
As long as it’s not inhumane
@8ZMD43W2yrs2Y
@8ZGG8TM2yrs2Y
As long as it stays to maybe just rats and overpopulated rodents
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...