Try the political survey

3 Replies

 @9884LCHanswered…1yr1Y

 @9L2ZGNKanswered…1mo1MO

We still have many poor in indias so once we hace freed them from poverty it will then be subsequent to fund the world health organization

 @9JW7J48Bharatiya Janataanswered…2mos2MO

I believe that funding our own countries programs should be a priority and then afterwards providing help to other countries when needed.

 @9FQ56TPanswered…7mos7MO

 @9CQ5GHQBharatiya Janataanswered…10mos10MO

Yes provided India gets a UNSC veto power and more say in world affairs

 @9CQ3MY5Bharatiya Janataanswered…10mos10MO

Yes to increase our influence on the activities of WHO and focus more on improving indigenous health programs.

 @9CQ2GTNIndian National Congressanswered…10mos10MO

The government should fund the WHO, keeping in mind about the economic situation. Proper Budget planning has to be done.

 @9CPMXSNCommunistanswered…10mos10MO

Funding the WHO is commendable, however these funds must be allocated towards helping developing countries more, since they are the ones under the fund crunch and also deprived of critical resources to combat epidemics.

 @939ZN8Zanswered…2yrs2Y

We should reduce the funding to the WHO by 20-30% and use that amount of money to fund local and national programs

Yes, but the contribution should be balanced with the domestic demand on food/health/humanitarian crisis.

 @93Q49PW from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

I think we shouldn’t fund both the world health organization and national and local programs as well

 @6M77WVV from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

 @92YHQCV from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute unless there's a Pandemic, then we'll increase the amount

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should declare anyone employed by the WHO outlaws and issue warrants for their arrest and bounties for their capture, dead or alive. In addition, the government should sanction all member countries.

 @7GQMXLT from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in an amount sufficient to acquire "soft power". Most of our policy making should reside at the state and local levels.

 @6Y9S378 from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @3DSBJC3answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but only with help from the rest the world and it should not be a big amount

 @8XQCD4Q from Washington answered…2yrs2Y

No, shift funding to establish an American Health Organization with a strict area of influence only covering the American contienent.

 @8XHRLH9 from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @8XGQ7PW from Idaho answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only relative to the current amount needed to combat illness.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

 @8W82FZ5 from Colorado answered…3yrs3Y

 @DreamBlueonE from Nevada answered…3yrs3Y

All Government financials need a rehaul and you should a get better Treasury and switch to a blockchain system I created; you need me

 @8VLZVR8 from Illinois answered…3yrs3Y

they should fund whatever needs to be funded in their own country if only it's to make healthcare and medicine free for people living in america.

 @887SFZP from New York answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RVPFGJ from Missouri answered…3yrs3Y

 @8RB2K9D from New York answered…3yrs3Y

No, fund national and local programs instead, and leave the United Nations

 @8Q7VBYD from New York answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only on the condition that we demand and enforce reform, and decouple the organization from undesirable influence from foreign adversaries.

 @akevinchen from California answered…3yrs3Y

  Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

The government should pull out, if not abolish, the World Health Organization

 @8PMF46F from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

No, we should share that responsibility with other nations in the United Nations. The amount should be proportionate to the GDP/economy of each nation

 @8PJHVJN from Pennsylvania answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NXSCW2 from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

 @8NWQH6W from California answered…3yrs3Y

Yes. but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute, also their should be an international investigation on WHO and China to find out if their was a cover up.

 @8H4DF7B from Arizona answered…3yrs3Y

 @6HDD83R from California answered…3yrs3Y

Drastically reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

 @6HDD83R from California answered…3yrs3Y

Reduce or end funding for as long as non-communist countries continue to have diplomatic relations with China (PRC) (instead of Taiwan (ROC) and recognize it's government as the sole legitimate government government of all China, and allowing people with PRC passports or passports with PRC visas and stamp, to enter the borders of non-communist countries

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...