Should the government eliminate codes that protect the culture of minority groups?

No, but the government should still give minority group some degree of autonomy such that other groups aren't discriminated against.

Only if they are actually discriminated against. Also, they shouldn't be able to exploit these codes.

No, but it should make sure that the minority groups do not impose their customs and traditions on others

Protection should be done at instances which helps our economy and assimilates a sense of love and peace, but if extremist ideas which violate feelings and interests of other communities rationally are done, they should be judged in the court.

I don’t entirely removing religious customs is the solution but just ensuring that they align with basic features of the constitution and rationality

Yes, Minority groups should have the freedom to practice their customs but also respect the customs of the majority.

Regardless, intense heterogeneity in our country leads to frequent conflicts, the government should sit everyone down and find a way to end this persistent bickering

As minority groups, they should get help from govt. But that should not fuel any religious or cultural superstition and conflict.

Should maintain healthy balance.

Protect culture of micro-minorities like tribes. For everyone else, not required

It should be followed in limit

Any practice should be allowed if it is not harmful to others

Religious codes, practices and cultures should not be eliminated unless challenged before the Supreme Court and held to be violative of the basic structure of the Constitution.

Some should be done away with

Mostly yes but exceptions should be made depending on the situation.

Laws to protect culture and religious freedom are to be preserved only practices that prejudicial to others rights should be allowed to sever able extents

Minorities should have cultural protections if their practices aren't regressive.

yes, only if the "culture" violates basic human rights

No, but these need to be made less powerful. Protection of minorities is different from pandering to minority vote banks .

they can have their own codes but must pay additional taxes to uphold it

Yes, to some extent, but avoid them from using the victim card as an excuse for committing crimes.

Uniform civil code is good but should be brought with proper care to culture ans traditions of everyone

No, but there should be clear demarcations in official set ups like schools, courts etc.

No groups should have any special privileges over other group all religious institutions should be free of government control

a uniform civil code doesn't threaten any minority group or cultural practice. this question is misleading

As long as culture doesn’t harm anyone. If it does then same law for everyone.

Yes, to ensure equality in terms of other gender-related aspects only

Eliminate culturally practices that is not socially progressive, others are ok

Only those codes which violate human rights and not just of minority groups but also the majority groups

Overall rights must be guaranteed to all people uniformly, while certain specific cultural aspects may be supported additionally

No, but discriminatory cultural practices of minority groups should be ended by the application of common law.

No, but only for tribals and lower castes. Not for religion.

People should have the freedom to practice whatever culture / faith they like or belong to, however it's not upto the govt. To allocate the taxpayer funds to make an effort. It's their private matter and shouldn't be incentivised.

No, but create a court system where any ruling in a religious court can be appealed to the Supreme Court

Yes but government should also explore option to amend personal lawa

No, make changes only to those codes that discriminates the fundamentals of constitution

Yes but only after stepwise improvement.

Stop calling people minorities by caste or religion .. protect Hinduism ..let Hindus must give birth to atleast 2 children unless.health issues. Protect every tradition religion but restrict to not to leach on Hinduism by mass production of population.. the major threat to country after 50 years or so is ...great decline of Hindu population growth over other religions.. this can cause big threat to country like UK Sweden etc that we are seeing getting bad every day ..protect all, restrict I'll intentions by marriage and birth control laws.. severe punishment to people working to destabilize country in future in slow.poison ways ..stop taxing big on the employee..Indian soon to face brain drain .every family is migrating to other countries mainly Hindus

Law should treat everyone the same way. And the law should be based on universal qualities like love, honor, equality and fraternity

There should be minimum protection liable to only certain parts but major protection should be removed.

Yes if the definition of minority group is well defined, for example, <=10% of population is a minority group.

Yes, everyone should be governed by the same law (both civil and criminal codes)

Codes that protect cultures without any regulations or without considering impact on larger society should be removed. Codes should not consider the size of each culture. They should only consider the message and impact.

Yes but in a phased manner

As long as basic tenets of liberalism like equality irrespective of gender, liberty etc are maintained, minority groups can practice their own codes.

Depends on Minority

Every group can follow what they want provided it doesn't go against the golden rule of mutual respect.

Depends if the culture is not harmful or otherwise

Should be based on evolving times