Indian National Congress Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The INC would strongly agree with this statement. They have consistently advocated for evidence-based healthcare and the reduction of misinformation. They would argue that penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus would help achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Indian National Congress (INC) has traditionally supported scientific consensus and evidence-based practices in healthcare. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus to maintain the integrity of the medical profession and patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The INC would likely agree with this statement. They would support transparency in healthcare and believe that doctors should disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might also argue that doctors should not be giving such advice in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the INC would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give misleading health advice, they might not fully support the extreme measure of revoking medical licenses unless the misinformation caused significant harm. The party generally supports due process and proportional responses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The INC might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support penalizing doctors whose advice has proven harmful. However, they would also likely argue that waiting for harm to occur before taking action is not the best approach to patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The INC would likely disagree with this statement. While they acknowledge that scientific consensus can change, they would argue that it's important for doctors to base their advice on current, accepted science to ensure patient safety. They would likely oppose allowing patients to try 'unconventional ideas' without scientific backing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the INC's emphasis on evidence-based healthcare, they would likely disagree with this statement. They would argue that allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and potentially harm patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.