34% Yes |
66% No |
31% Yes |
52% No |
3% Yes, the temple is an important symbol |
8% No, this decision should be made by the supreme court |
4% No, funding the construction of the temple is a political ploy and will fuel secularism |
|
1% No, and the Ram Temple should not be built |
See how support for each position on “Ram Temple” has changed over time for 55k India voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Ram Temple” has changed over time for 55k India voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from India users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9LCX2CY2wks2W
No religious places should be funded. Temples are looted with taxation all the time while funding terrorism centres like mosques and madrasas.
@9J8CSS33mos3MO
No, the Government should not be involved with spreading religion. It is the job of spiritual leaders, religious teachers and priests. Not politicians.
@9HFZG535mos5MO
The construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya should be paid by both the government and public donations.
@9H6FDPJ5mos5MO
Yes, because the revenue from Hindu Temples is administered by the Government. If they free the temples, it can be privately funded.
@8SKWKB73yrs3Y
No, but the temple should still be built
@8SC4CQW3yrs3Y
No. If donations are collected, they must be highly taxable.
Explore other topics that are important to India voters.
@ISIDEWITH2wks2W
High density housing refers to housing developments with a higher population density than average. For example, high rise apartments are considered high density, especially in comparison to single-family homes or condominiums. High density real estate can also be developed from empty or abandoned buildings.…
