+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 609 Left voters.

87%
Yes
13%
No
75%
Yes
13%
No
12%
Yes, and if a majority votes NOTA then current candidates would not be eligible for the next election

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 609 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 609 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9CQHY6Zanswered…1yr1Y

No, NOTA is a poorly drafted option which harms the moderates more than the extremes

 @938ZLH3answered…3yrs3Y

No because voting is already an option. Why vote and have that option when you have the option to not vote in the first place

 @8WRJKG5answered…3yrs3Y

But, if NOTA wins, then re-election must be conducted, instead of declaring runner up as winner.

 @8TFM6WNanswered…3yrs3Y

It should be allowed only once in the second round ( which should be conducted within 3 months) ppl hv to pick one if they are voting

 @8RNFLK6answered…4yrs4Y

No, voters should elect the Best they have in the options. NOTA will eventually lead to conduct the Election again

 @8QPJYPCanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and there should be a re-election if NOTA wins and old candidates shouldn't be allowed to contest the election, from that constituency.

 @8QDKXKYanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but if a majority votes NOTA then the election shouldn't be held valid and in the new election the current candidates won't be allowed to contest