Varaus Intiassa on prosessi kumoamisen tietty prosenttiosuus istuimet (avoimet työpaikat) valtiollisissa instituutioissa jäsenille taaksepäin ja aliedustettuina yhteisöt (määritelty ensisijaisesti kastiin ja heimo). Varaus on eräänlainen kiintiö-pohjainen positiivista syrjintää. Varaus säätelevät perustuslait, lakisääteisten lakeja ja paikallisia sääntöjä ja määräyksiä. Suljettuihin kasteihin (SC), Reittiliikenne Tribes (ST) ja Muut taaksepäin luokat (OBC) ovat ensisijaisia edunsaajia varauksen politiikkojen perustuslain - kanssa varmistuakseen "taso" pelikenttä.
@S9L9NK4v4Y
Yes, but with creamy layer exclusion.
@S9SFBR4v4Y
Yes, but people who have already benefited with the reservations should stop using it for their next generation. The whole purpose of reservation is to get the downtrodden on par with others.
@SBCTX54v4Y
Reservations are needed but the beneficiaries need to be properly identified. Focus must be on empowering through quality education from the primary classes not by offering reservations on a higher level
@SBVY724v4Y
No. But support time-bound reservations based on the Economic Criteria for the very low income groups.
@SBYJS24v4Y
make it irrelevant by increasing opportunities
@SCLQFV4v4Y
Combination of economic criterion, very verifiable caste based reservation and bound to one generation and / or proof of socio-economic advancement / betterment
@SCQ2L44v4Y
Yes, but it should be based on finacial status and not caste. There are several SC's ST's who are wealthy and still misuse the caste-based reservation.
@SB9LGW4v4Y
Difficult to do away with caste based reservation entirely for now. We should start enabling backward community and this is a long process before we can let go of caste based reservations
