Should the government pay for the construction of the Ram Temple at Ayodhya?

No religious places should be funded. Temples are looted with taxation all the time while funding terrorism centres like mosques and madrasas.

No, the Government should not be involved with spreading religion. It is the job of spiritual leaders, religious teachers and priests. Not politicians.

The construction of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya should be paid by both the government and public donations.

Yes, because the revenue from Hindu Temples is administered by the Government. If they free the temples, it can be privately funded.

No, but the temple should still be built

No. If donations are collected, they must be highly taxable.

No, and all temples should be managed privately.

It should be build with lublic donations

Yes as long as govt also gives equal priority to other religions and thier needs

No, Government should not involve with religious institutions (Though the temple should be built)

No, the govt should not be involved however the Temple is an important symbol and should be fundraised as it already is

The government should focus on bigger issues than this. Many rural areas in India are still devoid of basic facilities such as roads, schools, hospitals. For the construction of the temple people can donate according to their choice.

Art. 25 and 26 prohibit state promotion of religion, however, a state may in the public interest, and to preserve heritage may conserve ancient buildings of a religious nature.

Govt. Controls hindu temple along with donnations given to them and uses the money for secular purposes, this is discriminatory and unsecular and is done to no other institution, govt. Should give temples as well as donations to the community, no interference should be there Hindus can then use these donations effeciently to take care of their own temple needs.

Depends, yes for tourism, no for symbol of devotion

No, the temple should be made with the money from voluntary contributions, the government shouldn't have a hand at it.

No, it should be done through general donations by people

Not only for the Ram Mandir but not for any new place of worship.

Yes, But to a small extent

Ram Mandir should be allowed to be built..But the government should not pay for it

Support it , not fund it

No. Government need not fund but anyone can fund the project, but government can fund for the development of area around temple

Yes as Ayodhya is one of the most important sites for Hindus and it will be taxed later on. If it was on some other city, I would have said no.

No, this decision should be made by the Supreme Court. The Government should have no role in religious concerns.

It is not a government issue to get involved in religion

Building and funding should be down to states

It should be funded by people of india who belongs to that religion

Yes. The government should be paying for it, because tax is paid by Hindus too.

Publicly funded and by any other funding process by temple funds, or non governmental institutions

Temple is important , but no need for government fund

I dont't think the government should pay for it because the Indian government is not a religion based government and if they do pay for it, it will seem like they are in favor of a certain religion.

No, it should be privately funded

No, it should be publically funded.

Funding is not expected from the government rather citizens themselves funded it and we don't even ask for money from the government

A government should not fund the construction of any form of religious place, like Haj house, neither any religious place should be taxed. If the religious place is of historical importance then the government could take care of it’s maintainence.

Govt is not funding for the temple, it is a public fundraiser, please check relevance while framing your questions.

No, Only those citizens who have faith in Rama should donate.

Since existing temples are being managed by the government, building new ones should be done by the government as well. If not, stop taking revenues from temples, just like all other religious places and then not worry about building news ones

no, government should not have any part in it and a hindu organisation should be set up to do everything related to it. government, in general, must be kept out of any religious stuff

Involve people to donate along with government

Should be publically funded

No, Govts should have no say in any religious institutions

It should be constructed by a purely religious Hindu body.

We Hindus are enough to build our own temple we don’t need help from govt

Yes obviously ... Not only temple but for every spiritual things.

Government should spend money to utilise Ram Temple to give a boost to local economy . Can be done by building infrastructure.

No, but government should release temples from government control first.

Government is not funding Ram Temple at Ayodhya.

Govt should if needed to make it best