Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

While I am inclined to agree with the given statement, I believe that what qualifies as a "horrific crime" should be strictly defined in such a way that it cannot be misinterpreted deliberately or accidentally. Furthermore, in the age of AI the term "undeniable evidence" needs to be redefined as textual, auditory, and video evidence can all be faked extremely well to such a point where they are indistinguishable from real evidence. This problem must be tackled by the country's brightest AI researchers, and the definition of undeniable evidence must be constantly updated by a team of these researchers so as to keep up-to date with latest innovations in faking evidence, so as to prevent faked evidence from ever being seen as "undeniable" in a court of law.