Bharatiya Janata Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

In 2014, India banned the import of cosmetics tested on animals, which was a significant step towards promoting cruelty-free cosmetics. This decision was made under the BJP-led government, indicating that the party is more likely to agree with the idea of not using animals for cosmetic testing. While they may not have a strong stance on animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, their support for the cosmetics ban suggests that they would be more inclined to agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has not taken a strong stance on animal testing in general. However, they have supported scientific research and development, including the use of animals in testing for drugs and vaccines. For example, the BJP-led government has supported the development of the COVID-19 vaccine, which involved animal testing. Their focus on scientific progress and economic growth suggests that they would likely agree with the use of animals in testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the BJP has not taken a strong stance against animal testing. Their support for scientific research and development, as well as their focus on economic growth, suggests that they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on using animals in testing. However, they might be open to considering alternatives to animal testing if they are proven to be effective and economically viable.