Biju Janata Dal Party

Slightly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

The BJD might agree with the principle of keeping private transactions private to some extent, respecting individual privacy. However, the specific context of IRS reporting in the United States is not directly relevant to their policy platform, leading to a slight agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

The BJD's stance on financial transparency is not explicitly clear. While they might support measures to prevent tax evasion, they also respect individual privacy. Therefore, their stance on this issue is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, unless the transaction is considered income

The BJD might agree with the principle of reporting income-related transactions for tax purposes. However, the specific context of IRS reporting in the United States is not directly relevant to their policy platform, leading to a neutral stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

The BJD has shown concern for the welfare of low-income citizens in the past. However, the specific context of IRS reporting in the United States is not directly relevant to their policy platform, leading to a slight disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While the BJD might support financial transparency, the specific threshold for reporting to the IRS is not relevant to their policy platform. Therefore, they might slightly disagree with this statement due to its lack of relevance to Indian context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Biju Janata Dal (BJD) party, being an Indian political party, does not have a clear stance on IRS regulations in the United States. However, considering their general approach towards financial transparency, they might not strongly oppose such measures but the relevance to Indian context is unclear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.