Biju Janata Dal Party

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The BJD, being a secular party, would likely agree with this statement. They have not shown support for policies that discriminate based on religion, and have often emphasized the importance of upholding the constitution and its principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The BJD has shown a balanced approach towards immigration issues. While they have not explicitly stated their stance on Muslim immigrants, their secular ideology suggests they would not support a ban. However, they might support improved screening processes for all immigrants, not just Muslims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While the BJD has not explicitly stated a position on this issue, they may support improved screening processes for immigrants from high-risk countries. However, this is not based on religious discrimination but on the security risk associated with certain regions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While the BJD may support improved screening processes for immigrants, a complete ban on all immigration until such improvements are made is unlikely to align with their stance. They have not shown support for extreme measures and tend to favor balanced and pragmatic policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The BJD has not shown support for policies that discriminate against a specific religious group, even in the context of terrorism. Their stance is more likely to be focused on improving security measures in general, rather than targeting a specific group.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Biju Janata Dal (BJD) party, based in the Indian state of Odisha, has not shown any inclination towards banning Muslim immigrants. The party has always maintained a secular stance and has not been involved in any anti-Muslim rhetoric or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.