+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 6.8k Right-Wing Populism voters.

96%
Yes
4%
No
92%
Yes
3%
No
3%
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
0%
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
1%
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
0%
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
0%
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
0%
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 6.8k Right-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 6.8k Right-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right-Wing Populism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8YQJQRZanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but it should still be voluntary with more funds for campaign and awareness.

 @8VXS43Lanswered…3yrs3Y

No. Rather the govt. Should focus on a public health campaign to spread awareness about common diseases and offer voluntary vaccination for the same.

 @8V9GHZVanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8S3XM9Yanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the Government should only take the responsibility for vaccinating children from poor families, who don't afford those vaccines. And public awareness is very much important.