+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 6.8k Social Conservatism voters.

96%
Yes
4%
No
92%
Yes
3%
No
3%
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
0%
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
1%
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
0%
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
0%
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
0%
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 6.8k Social Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 6.8k Social Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Social Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8YQJQRZanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes but it should still be voluntary with more funds for campaign and awareness.

 @8VXS43Lanswered…3yrs3Y

No. Rather the govt. Should focus on a public health campaign to spread awareness about common diseases and offer voluntary vaccination for the same.

 @8V9GHZVanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8S3XM9Yanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the Government should only take the responsibility for vaccinating children from poor families, who don't afford those vaccines. And public awareness is very much important.