+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 395 Social Conservatism voters.

17%
Yes
83%
No
9%
Yes
67%
No
8%
Yes, but benefits should expire for their next generation
12%
No, reservation should be based on economic position
4%
No, and completely eliminate the caste system

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 395 Social Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 395 Social Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Social Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B28HM7Mfrom Guam  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but with a revision of the reservation criteria and levels based on a comprehensive caste census

 @B23G26Yanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, but benefits should expire for their next generation and also complete elimination of the caste system

 @9PS88M3answered…7mos7MO

At present, yes. The goal is to gradually uproot deep rooted discrimination and strive for annihilation of caste someday.

 @9K2JFLYanswered…11mos11MO

I find the current reservation system to be inadequate to address the concern and Marginalization is a more complex phenomenon, that now needs an intersectional approach to be understood and addressed. Merely caste-based reservation may not solve the issue at the root.

 @979XN3F from New York  answered…1yr1Y

 @92M7ZS2answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YNBS7Janswered…3yrs3Y

no, but only highly risked communities either socially or economically should get reserved and the benefits should expire economically uplifted backward castes.