@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policyStarted 3yrs agoActive 4mos ago

Should the United States provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

Should India provide military supplies and funding to Ukraine?

On February 24 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War that began in 2014. The invasion caused Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II, with around 7.1 million Ukrainians fleeing the country and a third of the population displaced. It has also caused global food shortages.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 511 India voters.

25%
Yes
75%
No
10%
Yes
68%
No
14%
Yes, but only provide humanitarian aid
5%
No, we should not get involved in this conflict
0%
Yes, and increase the current amount of resources we are providing
2%
No, Ukraine should rely on their own resources to defend themselves
0%
Yes, but with strict accountability.
1%
No, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now
0%
Yes, but decrease the current amount of resources we are providing
0%
No, we cannot afford to give military resources right now

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 511 India voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 511 India voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from India voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZSMX4Vanswered…4mos4MO

We should encourage peace and dialogue over fuelling some arms race.

 @9NLDFH8answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but ensure that right wing groups do not get weapons

 @9NDLCZPfrom Georgia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only provide humanitarian aid and establish military protection zones for the protection of the Ukrainian people.

 @9FMZP8Hanswered…1yr1Y

Peace should be encouraged in Ukraine but no resources of India should be sent there

 @9CQW3JGanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but we should facilitate mediation process to end war

 @98Q2YPNanswered…2yrs2Y

We will not provide aid and support to Nazis and drug addicts.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Ukrainian Defense Funding” news articles, updated frequently.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

House Democrats Filibuster Flip-Flop: Keep It When the GOP’s in Charge, Kill It When We Are

Filibuster for me, but not for thee. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), an outspoken critic of the Senate filibuster, indicated Monday that she will not support axing the procedural hurdle as long as Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. “Am I championing getting rid of the filibuster now when the Senate has the trifecta? No,” the chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus said at a press conference on Capitol Hill. “But had we had the trifecta, I would have been, because we have to show that government can deliver,” Jayapal added. The Senate filibuster rule, which requires a 60-vote threshold to end debate and pass most types of legislation in the upper chamber, is seen as the best chance Democrats have at blocking the adoption of President-elect Donald Trump agenda – with Republicans taking a 53-47 seat advantage in the Senate and expected to retain a slim majority in the House. Jayapal, as recently as September, was pushing to “abolish” what she called the “Jim Crow filibuster.” “The filibuster was originally created *by mistake* in 1806,” she wrote on X. “Every day we don’t abolish it is just as big a mistake.”The Washington Democrat dislikes that the procedural tool makes it difficult for progressives to ram their agenda through Congress. “It’s the filibuster OR an assault weapons ban. It’s the filibuster OR codified abortion access. It’s the filibuster OR raising the minimum wage. It’s the filibuster OR protecting voting rights. The choice is clear. Abolish the Jim Crow filibuster,” Jayapal tweeted. The progressive rep argued Monday that passing a liberal agenda would’ve “built some trust with the American people.”“If we had had control of the trifecta and gotten rid of the filibuster to pass minimum wage, to pass paid sick leave, to pass many of these things that are passing – abortion access – that are passing on ballot measures that are so popular … then I think we would have built some trust with the American people,” Jayapal argued.

▲  226 replies