Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 19.5k India voters.
38% Yes |
62% No |
34% Yes |
50% No |
4% Yes, the temple is an important symbol |
6% No, this decision should be made by the supreme court |
4% No, funding the construction of the temple is a political ploy and will fuel secularism |
|
1% No, and the Ram Temple should not be built |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 19.5k India voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 19.5k India voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from India voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9DKL6GD1yr1Y
Temple is important , but no need for government fund
@9D4HNVC1yr1Y
No, it should be privately funded
@93XZXB72yrs2Y
No, build a school instead
@8WLJN3B3yrs3Y
its been proven dozens of times govnmt is not funding its thru almost 3000 crores worth donation from devotees and supportes and dozens of celebs too
@B26HZ7W 1 day1D
Government should ask people to fund and then that fund can be put in FD or invested which will grow and will make a dream come true.
@9ZYKS273wks3W
I dont mind govt spending on ayodhya mandir but only to very important and selective places which means a lot to the entire country not every temple
@9ZGXSK21mo1MO
Have a mix of funding between the devotees and government assistance, but Hindu temples should never be owned and controlled by a gov authority.
@9WY3DY92mos2MO
The Temple should be built not with Taxpayer's money, but with Donations from Hindus who are devoted to Lord Ram. Using Taxpayer's money is an insult to both the Taxpayer and Lord Ram.
Join in on the most popular conversations.