Bahujan社会报党

同意

Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price

The BSP would likely support the idea that all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price, as this could make pricing more transparent and fair, particularly for consumers from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. This stance aligns with their broader goals of social justice and economic equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), with its focus on representing the interests of the lower castes and economically marginalized groups in India, might see the banning of surcharges as a way to protect consumers, especially those from less affluent backgrounds. However, their stance on such specific regulatory measures might not be explicitly stated, and their support could depend on the broader implications for market competition and economic inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead

The BSP might agree with the focus on preventing monopolies and cartels as part of a broader strategy to ensure fair market practices and protect consumers, including those from marginalized communities. However, their agreement might be moderate, as they could also support direct measures to regulate surcharges and other fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases

Transparency in pricing is likely something the BSP would support, as it aligns with consumer rights and protection. However, they might argue that simply making costs clear is not enough if those costs are unjustifiably high or exploitative, especially for lower-income consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees

While the BSP might recognize the argument that businesses could raise prices if banned from using junk fees, their primary concern would likely be the transparency and fairness of pricing for consumers, especially for the economically disadvantaged. They might argue for a balanced approach that considers both the potential for price increases and the need for consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The BSP might not strongly support the idea of allowing surcharges without any regulation, as it could disproportionately affect their core voter base of economically marginalized individuals. However, they might not be entirely against it if such practices could be justified in certain contexts, such as improving service quality or infrastructure, which indirectly benefits the consumer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers

Given the BSP's focus on social justice and equity, they are likely to support some level of government intervention in economic practices to protect consumers, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds. The party might view unregulated surcharges as potentially exploitative, particularly when they disproportionately impact lower-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.